Скопировано

Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial System: The Experience of Argentina and Kazakhstan

Дата публикации
Modern technologies are increasingly being introduced into the justice system, demonstrating the potential to increase the speed and efficiency of judicial processes.

In Buenos Aires, the use of artificial intelligence has already become a reality, and in Kazakhstan, this practice is just beginning to gain momentum.

In the capital of Argentina, ChatGPT is actively used to prepare court decisions in the administrative and tax disputes department.

The algorithm analyzes the uploaded documents, classifies them using templates and generates a draft resolution. To date, ChatGPT has processed about 20 cases, reducing the time for preparing decisions from one hour to 10 minutes.

Buenos Aires Deputy Attorney General Juan Corvalan notes that the introduction of technology has changed the role of lawyers, turning them from authors of decisions into editors.

For the first time, ChatGPT was used instead of the previously used PROMETEA system, which predicted case outcomes with an accuracy of up to 90%, but required significant costs to train new algorithms.

Experts' warning

The problems of data anonymization, algorithm bias, and the risk of so-called "hallucinations" - the generation of false information - raise questions about the ethics and safety of using AI in justice.

Despite this, the authorities of Buenos Aires continue to expand the use of technologies, hoping for their further democratization.

In Kazakhstan, AI is being introduced into administrative proceedings. Robotic systems are engaged in selecting cases and sending them to courts. Thus, administrative cases on traffic violations are now considered in 10 minutes instead of 3 days.

According to representatives of the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan, AI eliminates the human factor and errors.

Judges receive ready-made data for verification and decision-making. Since the system was launched in July to August 2024, more than 7.5 thousand cases have been processed, and the system's potential is estimated at 100 thousand road accident cases annually.

Judge Uldana Suleimenova emphasizes that the process is as simplified as possible: if the parties agree to expedite the consideration of the case, the judge only checks the data and issues a ruling.

The experience of both countries shows that AI has great potential for transforming justice.

However, issues of data security, decision quality and ethics remain relevant, requiring careful analysis and control.


(the text is translated automatically)